Select Page


Paul A. Oakley D.C. & Deed E. Harrison, D.C.

Annals of Vertebral Subluxation Research ~ March 10, 2018 ~ Pages 48-56



Background: Extremely restrictive radiology guidelines have recently been adopted within the chiropractic profession that pose a public health threat. Risk assessment from exposure to radiation from diagnostic x-rays are based on the linear no-threshold (LNT) model/hypothesis that has been disproved for use in risk estimates in the low-dose range, i.e. less than 100mGy (10,000mrem).

Discussion: We discuss ten reasons why routine radiography should be the standard in chiropractic practice including: it offers zero harm to the patient; contemporary evidence-based methods require it, these methods lead to better outcomes; incidental findings are important; it increases patient satisfaction; it completes a thorough exam; it satisfies practitioner medico-legal liability concerns; its costs are minimal; alternative methods (i.e. MRI) are not practical for daily practice and are typically performed in the nonphysiologic recumbent position and do not convey appropriate biomechanical information; finally, it may enhance patient health by hormesis.

Conclusion: As opposed to current x-ray reduction efforts and traditional beliefs, the weight of the current evidence substantiates two facts: 1. X-rays are not harmful to patients; 2. X-rays should be a routine part of the comprehensive spinal assessment in order to deliver optimal and contemporary chiropractic care.

Key words: Radiation, x-rays, hormesis, spinal radiographs, chiropractic, cancer, clinical practice, risk assessment, biomechanics, vertebral subluxation, spinal adjustment, spinal manipulation

To view the full article, Subscribe or Login
Sign Up for our Free Newsletter!

Sign Up for our Free Newsletter!

Get updates on chiropractic research, news, and other information important to you and the chiropractic profession.

You have Successfully Subscribed!